Agreed. A good idea even.
Terry
Terry Fielder
terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com
Associate Director Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
Fax: (416) 441-9085
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
I really think we should use a page on the new website to collect
the errata, like here: http://new.openspf.org/RFC_4408/Errata
That's fine.
Anyone want to be the master editor for the errata list?
It has a revision history, the Council could revert nonsense^Wless
useful modifications. Anybody who finds an uncontroversional error
should be able to add it, with some minimal protocol:
- Propose it here and/or the devel list
- Wait some time for nits and objections (say two weeks)
- Add it if there's "rough consensus"
- The Council can sanction "official" errata revisions
- The Council can sanction controversional errata (and add them)
With that approach two pages are probably better, one working
page, and the last approved (by the Council) page. The last
point of this procedure could then be:
- The Council can revert the working page to an approved page.
Does that make sense ?
Frank
P.S.: compare <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.w3c.uri/863>
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com