spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise

2006-11-01 13:45:58
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:45:38 -0500 Jeff Macdonald 
<jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com> 
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:23:29AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Then try:

Mail From: testuser(_at_)nospf(_dot_)example(_dot_)com
....

From: testuser(_at_)spf(_dot_)example(_dot_)com
Sender: testuser(_at_)nospf(_dot_)example(_dot_)com

Expected result is NONE.  This shows why PRA is useless (most MUAs don't 
display sender).

Some MUAs will display this (outlook for example):

From: <value of sender header> on behalf of <value of RFC822 From header>

Yes.  Outlook was the exception I had in mind when I said most don't.

Make it resent-sender in the example and Outlook doesn't display it either.

Scott K

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [spf-discuss] Re: MS Puts SID Patents Under Open Specification Promise, Scott Kitterman <=