On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Last time I looked at their wizard, the default output was a v=spf1 record.
Yes, but they recommend to treat it like a spf2.0/pra record.
I think they do encourage v=spf1. That was presumably part of Meng's "Deal
with the devil".
Yes, and MS behaviour is spot on for a Faustian deal. They *are* promoting
v=spf1 - but they also promote treating it just like spf2.0/pra.
I.e. publishers must publish spf2.0/pra if only to prevent MS software
from abusing their v=spf1 records.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com