Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
most of the HELO Received-SPF header field is redundant, and having both
is confusing for those humans looking at the mail header. I am not
*against* having both, and maybe I'll have an option to report HELO SPF
results in a second Received-SPF header. But I dislike the redundancy
for aesthetic reasons.
Maybe limit Received-SPF for HELO identities to "interesting" results (?)
Also, when reputation code is processing Received-SPF headers from a
trusted relay/forwarder to find who to blame for the email, one-stop
shopping is cleaner.
If a trusted HELO PASS is the reason to skip further MAIL FROM checks
you have only one SPF result, that would be clean / clear.
And is my name ok? Or do you prefer another name?
IMO anything X-guessed in a standard Received-SPF is dangerous. Nothing's
wrong with guessing, but please make sure that it can't be confused with a
standard SPF result. By humans or by SA bots... ;-)
Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735