-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Julian Mehnle wrote:
I think any attempts to get "v=spf1" to "Standard" status are a waste of
time. What is there to be gained?
I'll say it again: Let's spend our efforts on v=spf3 instead.
Let me clarify: A year ago, before "v=spf1" was published as an RFC, our
attempts to get onto standards track obviously made perfect sense, mostly
from a PR standpoint. But now that there is RFC 4408, who really cares
about "SPFv1 is now an IETF standard!" anymore? I mean, who besides _us_?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGBwv0wL7PKlBZWjsRAmC/AJ9fkxmjvsuT36Z1rxmlr1Q1ClFDPACeNEF2
Izga8uTGbj7FJ9TznOB2rto=
=C11m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735