Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
Ditto, trying to outsmart others is often a recipe for
disaster.
Then the OP should assume "\"v=spf1 ... was intentional,
and thus not an SPF policy.
Yep, we agree anyway about the outcome, I just looked which
of your examples are explicitly dealt with in RFC 4408.
(thus: "v=spf1" "a" "mx" "-all" instead of "v=spf1 a mx
-all")
Explicitly mentioned in the specification, all plausible
trouble we could foresee.
Is it? Where?
3.1.3, multiple strings in a DNS record:
| IN TXT "v=spf1 .... first" "second string..."
| MUST be treated as equivalent to
| IN TXT "v=spf1 .... firstsecond string..."
Maybe not exactly your case, but close enough for readers to
get the idea.
Frank
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com