On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
If helo name addition were mandatory or rDNS correct, ptr:%{o} would match in
some cases. We could add a "ptrhelo" mechanism to mean ptr + helo, and/or a
"helo" one to mean only the added helo name. Thus, helo:%{h} would be a
tautology. Is that (sort of) what you meant?
Yes. A separate helo mechanism would probably be cleaner. I only
proposed adding it to ptr because HELO effectively acks as a PTR record
delivered via SMTP instead of DNS.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com