Its such a small issue that causes huge problems, I can't see any
benefit whatsoever of enforcing minimisation at this time.
would you object to <hr/> being output as <hr></hr> (and similarly img,
br, meta, etc?
I fail to see why it is a problem at all, if you give the file
containing <div/> to an xhtml renderer such as mozilla or netscape, it
works fine. If you want to use an html system then quite a lot of things
are likely to go wrong if you give it xml, so why not use the html
output method?
It isn't only <div/> If you are sending to a legacy html browser you'll
need <br /> not <br/> or <br></br> the content of script elements is
almost impossible to get right as html script is CDATA and that does not
exist as an element type in XML, ...
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list