Re: optional children

Yates, Danny (ANTS) wrote:

> Unless I'm missing something, this solution fails to satisfy
> the question*
> *
Well, it was just an idea, you can always make it more accurately, e.g.
<xsl:if test="a[b][count(b|c|d) = count(*)]">

--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel


XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list