Dear David,
the second alternative you mentioned with the two pass solution appears clear
in my mind, although never have done it. Surely this a FAQ and the use of a
second namespace will be the way to go. Because of that we only do until now
client-side xsl-processing (IE6) trying to avoid the ms propietary interface
ActiveX, this two pass solution it´s not a practical solution for my problem to
customizing the url-selection.
The first alternative it not clear at all. Could you please forward a littel
example,although this may be also a FAQ :-(
Thanks,
Hans
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list