Re: XSL frustration (was: Re: N : M transformation)

xsl-list

[Top] [All Lists]

2003-01-31 13:59:18

That's cool, I'll wait for the standard. For now I'm in luck, libXSLTsupports exsl:document


simon

On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 04:57  AM, Tobias Reif wrote:

It's your decision if you prefer reliance on drafts or on extensions,but the XSLT 2.0 syntax will become "standard" (part of a W3C XSLTrec) AFAICS.

---
www.simonwoodside.com


XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: XSL frustration (was: Re: N : M transformation), David . Pawson Re: XSL frustration (was: Re: N : M transformation), S Woodside Re: XSL frustration (was: Re: N : M transformation), Dimitre Novatchev RE: XSL frustration (was: Re: N : M transformation), Passin, Tom Re: XSL frustration (was: Re: N : M transformation), Tobias Reif Re: XSL frustration (was: Re: N : M transformation), S Woodside <=

Previous by Date:	does Xerces2 Java Parser 2.3.0 Release validate the schema, Latha V. M.
Next by Date:	RE: How to check whether any of child node with particular tag name h as non-empty String value, Wang, Dongzhi (ACF)
Previous by Thread:	Re: XSL frustration (was: Re: N : M transformation), Tobias Reif
Next by Thread:	Transforming XML to HTML Table, Nick Foster
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]