is there a way of efficiently get the position() of A in that node-set
sets do not have any order (that's the difference between a set and a
list). the value of position() depends on the current node list
used to select the node, not the node set that contains the node.
If you select a node with . or .. or parent:: then it will always have
position()=1 for example.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list