Boo!
(Back again after rather a long time away from the list...)
Jeni Tennison wrote:
The plan is to have conformance levels so that processors don't have
to implement the schema-aware aspects of XSLT/XPath 2.0, which I think
is the biggest problem area in terms of getting XSLT 2.0 implemented.
Aha! Does this mean that the typeTagger transform transform [1] (for
generating transforms from XSDs to mark up instance data elements with
type attributes) may have a useful future after all?
Francis.
[1] http://www.schemavalid.com/utils/typeTagger.zip
--
"Never mind manoeuvre, go straight at 'em." - Admiral Horatio Nelson
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list