Tobi Reif wrote:
Would it make sense to modularize the XSLT2 spec? Then implementaers
could choose a defined subset to start with, and users and XSLTs
could always know which processor supports which areas of the spec.
(I didn't yet read all of XSLT2, so I might be missing a lot.)
The plan is to have conformance levels so that processors don't have
to implement the schema-aware aspects of XSLT/XPath 2.0, which I think
is the biggest problem area in terms of getting XSLT 2.0 implemented.
As indicated in the current Working Draft, there will also be a
serialization 'module' -- XSLT processors don't have to be able to
serialize the result tree that they generate.
Cheers,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list