If the goal is to work with WXS, and if the output is garbage
(XSLT2.0), then maybe you should consider that the input might have
been garbage (WXS). If more people within the W3C would complain about
WXS, then maybe something more positive would be done with that spec.
simon
On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 04:54 PM, Jim Melton wrote:
The goal of the "group of people" has always been, and still is, to
produce a new language that works well in the brave new world of XML
Schema-typed documents. If your documents are either purely DTD-based
or have no metadata associated with them at all, then the features of
XSLT 2.0 that correspond to the XSLT 1.0 specification are all you
need use. If you want to deal with Schema-typed documents, then you
have more power available.
--
anti-spam: do not post this address publicly
www.simonwoodside.com -- 99% Devil, 1% Angel
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list