Daniel Veillard wrote:
>>"I'm just stating why I think at this point that I won't be able to
>>implement XSLT-2.0 nor XPath-2.0 anytime soon."
>>
> true, but I didn't tried.
>
>>So is the spec the reason or not? If the reason is only it's reliance
>> on
>>XML Schemas Structure, then that's the issue which should be resolved.
>>
> the reliance on XML Schemas, independantly of the lack of time, is
> in my current view the main factor. On the other hand I understand the
> value of being able to select based on types.
So since WXS stuff might not be required for conformance, and you don't
seem to see any other roadblocks, perhaps we might at some point see
XSLT 2.0 implemented in xsltproc ... ? :)
Tobi
--
http://www.pinkjuice.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list