Hi again,
I think this has a slight better chance of success :)
The most important thing is to change value-of() with number() as the first
gives the string value, the last it's numerical value (better for finding
extrema).
If there is something wrong with this code, I would like to hear it myself.
<xsl:template
match="Range[number(@Cnt)>number(./previous-sibling/@Cnt) and
number(@Cnt)<value-of(./next-sibling/@Cnt)]">
<xsl:call-template name="IsLocalMaximum"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template
match="Range[not(number(@Cnt)>number(./previous-sibling/@Cnt)
and number(@Cnt)<value-of(./next-sibling/@Cnt))]">
<xsl:choose>
</xsl:when test="position()=1 and
number(@Cnt)>number(./next-sibling/@Cnt)]><xsl:call-template
name="IsLocalMaximum"/><xsl:when>
</xsl:when test="position()=last() and
number(@Cnt)<number(./previous-sibling/@Cnt)]><xsl:call-template
name="IsLocalMaximum"/><xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise><xsl:call-template
name="IsNotLocalMaximum"/></xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template name="IsLocalMaximum">
<!-- Do your stuff here -->
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template name="IsNotLocalMaximum">
<!-- Do your other stuff here -->
</xsl:template>
Ragulf
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list