I'm not a master of ieft specs either, but 1738 appears
to be quite agnostic on the question. file: is system specific,
so it just depends on what the tool implements.
Perhaps file: resolution should attempt to use the
smb protocol, but it doesn't sound like an obvious
design decision, at least not when 1738 was written.
- Mitch
David(_dot_)Pawson(_at_)rnib(_dot_)org(_dot_)uk wrote:
If I were a master at spec interpretation I'd do it.
I'm not. I'm seeking help.
but good suggestion.
e.g. who knows how
file://\\church\other-path
relates to http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt ?
UNC's are not mentioned.
More to come.
regards DaveP
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list