Hi
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of
J.Pietschmann
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:10 PM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] document() access. The combinations
David(_dot_)Pawson(_at_)rnib(_dot_)org(_dot_)uk wrote:
[file://c:/sgml/files/uriIncl.xml] OK
Content is Some other doc
Amazing. Unless I'm misinterpreting the spec, this should be
interpreted as a file on host "c", with an incomplete port
part, i.e. the URL is malformed.
Not quite. If the port is missing them the default port of the chosen
protocol should be used (80 for http, 21 for ftp, etc.)
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list