xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re: XSLT model not "natural"? [was Re: [ANN] FreeMarker 2.3 as an alternative to XSLT]

2003-06-30 09:16:26
Hi

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com 
[mailto:owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of 
Jonathan Revusky
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 6:59 PM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: XSLT model not "natural"? [was Re: 
[ANN] FreeMarker 2.3 as an alternative to XSLT]


Américo Albuquerque wrote:
Hi


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com] On Behalf 
Of 
Dimitre Novatchev
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 7:30 AM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: [xsl] Re: XSLT model not "natural"? [was Re: [ANN] 
FreeMarker 2.3 as an alternative to XSLT]


Maybe it is very hard for babies to start walking.

Well, in case you are visiting from Mars, I think I should point out 
that human infants start to walk and to talk at a certain age without 
any particular teaching or training effort whatsoever.

First of all, wasn't me who said that, so it would be polite if you had
replied to the original thread.

It isn't entirely true that human infants start walking and talking without
training, they have training, it is a different kind of training that
doesn't require a teacher, it is made manly by there parents.


Meanwhile, various academic studies attest to the fact that neither 
human infants nor adults start spontaneously writing XSLT 
stylesheets at 
any age.

As with any other programing language


I think the above surprising facts go a long way towards 
explaining why 
Mulberrytech, for example, is able to have a viable business training 
people to use XSLT, and does not offer equivalent training in 
teaching 
toddlers how to walk.


Shall we "protect" them from this difficulty and ensure they
were easily crawling around all their life?

Make a special tool/product to ensure this?

<sigh>

This analogy with toddlers learning to walk is surely one of 
the worst 
metaphors I've heard in a long time. Not only do toddlers 
learn to walk 
spontaneously with no adult intervention, but also, they necessarily 

As said before not completely true, they had to have some adult intervention
otherwise they simply would walk at all. This intervention is, of course,
spontaneous. The parents give the example. They "teach" there children how
to walk and how to talk by doing that in front of them, children learn manly
by imitation.

*must* learn to walk. There is no equivalent need for 
everybody to learn 
XSLT. For all of it, it's just one more IT tool among many.

If another tool can be used for the same purposes and good 
results can 
also be achieved, but with far less training effort, say, 
that may well 
be an advantage that one should consider. Again, this is a 
question that 
would have to be resolved empirically.

I agree with  you. It has been said many times that in some situations xslt
wasn't the wright tool for the job.


I posted the announcement here because I am interested in getting 
feedback about FreeMarker's new declarative XML processing 
functionality. I am not terribly interested in hearing 
dubious analogies 
like this, that, besides being obviously absurd, do not contain any 
useful content.

Well, maybe I'm being a bit oversensitive, but it seems to me 
that the 
subtext of this ridiculous analogy was that it was meant as a 
put-down. 
I think, in any case, that people should think more about 
what they're 
saying before saying it -- like, whether what they're saying 
makes any 
sense or has any constructive content whatsoever.... that 
kind of thing...

I wasn't trying to make any king of analogies but simply stating that many
of what we are is based on what we learn, even talking.

  Américo Albuquerque



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list