RE: Re: more elegant way to process element with default value?

Thanks, Dmitre and Steve, for your helpful suggestions.
Based on David Carlisle's response, I may decide to use an attribute
after all (which can be easily defaulted).

Regards,
Lars


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
more elegant way to process element with default value?, Lars Huttar Re: more elegant way to process element with default value?, Steve Rosenberry Re: more elegant way to process element with default value?, Dimitre Novatchev RE: Re: more elegant way to process element with default value?, Lars Huttar <= Re: more elegant way to process element with default value?, David Carlisle RE: more elegant way to process element with default value?, Lars Huttar RE: more elegant way to process element with default value?, David Carlisle RE: more elegant way to process element with default value?, Passin, Tom coping with huge xml-saxon, XSL Chatr Re: coping with huge xml-saxon, Johannes Döbler Re: coping with huge xml-saxon, Paul Tremblay Re: coping with huge xml-saxon, david_n_bertoni RE: coping with huge xml-saxon, Michael Kay Re: coping with huge xml-saxon, Paul Tremblay