I might reasonably expect that regexp-group(4) would get hold of the fourth
match string?
I think it would be unreasonable to expect that.
regexp-group (4) is the fourth parameterised group, ie what's known as
$4 or \4 in regexp replace languages of old.
This isn't true if there is a mismatch in between?
Yet is true if I get sequential matches?
Can't guess what you mean here:-)
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list