-----Original Message-----
From: Dipesh Khakhkhar
Well as I said it as a discrepancy, i mean even if the timing
shown on the
Windows 2000 server was less, it took longer than on the windows
XP even if
No, it didn't... 2198 + 7.545 + 18.70 + 4379 is more than 27.01 + 8.515
server was having more memory.
The CPU Speed of the two machine are
Windows XP : Single Processor of 800 Mhz.
Windows 2000 server: Dual Processor each of 500 Mhz.
So even everything is more configuration wise why it took long
time (whereas
No, it's not... unless there's automatic parallel processing. If only 1 of
the 2 CPUs is used on the server, however...
it didn't showed the correct time with -t command in MSXSL).
And that's the very same version of MSXSL? (Besides this: how do you *know*
what the correct time is?)
Greetz,
Andreas Delmelle
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list