xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re: Relation between Memory /Time Problem and OS ??

2003-09-22 13:52:10
-----Original Message-----
From: Dipesh Khakhkhar


Well as I said it as a discrepancy, i mean even if the timing
shown on the
Windows 2000 server was less, it took longer than on the windows
XP even if

No, it didn't... 2198 + 7.545 + 18.70 + 4379 is more than 27.01 + 8.515

server was having more memory.

The CPU Speed of the two machine are

Windows XP : Single Processor of 800 Mhz.

Windows 2000 server: Dual Processor each of 500 Mhz.

So even everything is more configuration wise why it took long
time (whereas

No, it's not... unless there's automatic parallel processing. If only 1 of
the 2 CPUs is used on the server, however...

it didn't showed the correct time with -t command in MSXSL).


And that's the very same version of MSXSL? (Besides this: how do you *know*
what the correct time is?)


Greetz,

Andreas Delmelle


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list