I apologize !!! It was a stupid mistake in my xsl.
Thanks for your time.
--- David Carlisle <davidc(_at_)nag(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:
Looks right.
You'll need to post a slightly less mininimal xsl
without the ...
so we can run it and compare output.
David
--
http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star
Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more
information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around
the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
XSL-List info and archive:
http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list