RE: specifying html doctypes using xslt literal result stylesheets

> Perhaps it isn't widely used because it is broken...?
> Why is it in the spec?  It is also in the 2.0
> spec...
It's not very useful, but it isn't broken.

It's in the 2.0 spec because it was in the 1.0 spec. You can't just take
things out because you don't think they are very useful.

Michael Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list