RE: Problem with position( ) function

yes.. the problem I had is that always the xsl received a nodeset containing 
all nodes.... inside the template I was filtering what nodes to include and 
what not. That's why I had problems with comparison position() with last()

Jaime

-----Mensaje original-----
De: owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com]En nombre de 
David
Carlisle
Enviado el: Lunes, 01 de Diciembre de 2003 9:47
Para: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Asunto: Re: [xsl] Problem with position( ) function



  Thanks.. but the problem I have is that condition "position() &lt;
  last()" doesn't work because position() gets the position 
of the last
  node in the XML, and not of the last node with the same agr_id. 

position() _never_ relates to a position in the original 
tree. It always
refers to a position in the current node list. If that 
current node list
consists of nodes with a particular ACT_AGR_ID as in the example code
posted, then position() will equal last() on the last of those nodes.

David


-- 
http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew

______________________________________________________________
__________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
______________________________________________________________
__________

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list