My question was then, whether there is something that I have missed...
probably not. You can move the test into the match if you want of
course:
<xsl:template match="A" mode="two">
<xsl:if test="not(preceding-sibling::node()[1][self::A])">2</xsl:if>
</xsl:template>
can be written
<xsl:template match="A" mode="two"/>
<xsl:template match="A[not(preceding-sibling::node()[1][self::A])]"
mode="two">2</xsl:template>
If you prefer.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--