Hi Ragulf,
Can you be more precise on the output you like?
And I think that the solution is not really short, but not necessarily
complex...
Grtz,
Geert
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for your answer. I have found that the question might not be
as simple as my example XML and XSL in my initial mail.
I am not sure that I understand what your solution does, but I will
certainly look at it.
Regards,
Ragulf Pickaxe :-)
How about:
test="generate-id() = generate-id(preceding-sibling::*[local-name() =
local-name(current())][1]/following-sibling::*[1])"
Which should check that the current node is the element which
immediately follows the nearest preceding-sibling element with the same
local name. As the check uses * it skips text only nodes.
cheers
andrew
--
Geert(_dot_)Josten(_at_)Daidalos(_dot_)nl
IT-consultant at Daidalos BV, Zoetermeer (NL)
http://www.daidalos.nl/
tel:+31-(0)79-3316961
fax:+31-(0)79-3316464
GPG: 1024D/12DEBB50
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--