<xsl:for-each select="node[1] | child::node">
that's the same thing as
<xsl:for-each select="node">
1) With Xalan-J 2.6.0
,
that would be a bug
2) With Saxon 8
,,,,,,,,
that would be right
3) With MSXSL 4
, , , , , , , ,
are you sure it was that or was the result really the same as saxon,
butmsxml4 output in utf16 so you get a 0 byte between eacch ascii
character?
It therefore seems to me, *that the test, position()
!= last() does'nt work correctly with Xalan-J 2.6,
looks that way but system bugs should be reported to the system
maintainers rather than here:-)
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--