xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: for-each and summing based on group

2005-01-05 10:37:04
This for-each correctly displays the sum on a non-grouping level.
Customer is displayed for each Trade, but there can be many trades with the
same Customer.  When changing the xsl from 1.0 to 2.0 there were errors.
Is it simpler to do that, or use Muenchian grouping for the Customer?


<xsl:for-each select="Trade">

<xsl:sort select="Customer"/> 

<tr class="r{position() mod 2}">

<td><xsl:value-of select="Customer"/> </td>

<td><xsl:value-of select="TradeId"/><xsl:text/></td>

<td><xsl:value-of select="Type"/><xsl:text/></td>

<td align="right">
<xsl:value-of select="format-number(sum(Step
   
[concat(substring(MinFlowDate,7),substring(MinFlowDate,1,2),substring(MinFlowDate,4,2))&gt;=
concat(substring($global,7),substring($global,1,2),substring($global,4,2))]
   
[concat(substring(MinFlowDate,7),substring(MinFlowDate,1,2),substring(MinFlowDate,4,2))&lt;
concat(substring($global,7)+3,substring($global,1,2),substring($global,4,2))]
   /StepCharge)+ sum(Step
   
[concat(substring(MinFlowDate,7),substring(MinFlowDate,1,2),substring(MinFlowDate,4,2))&gt;=
concat(substring($global,7),substring($global,1,2),substring($global,4,2))]
   
[concat(substring(MinFlowDate,7),substring(MinFlowDate,1,2),substring(MinFlowDate,4,2))&lt;
concat(substring($global,7)+3,substring($global,1,2),substring($global,4,2))]
   /StepSetoff)  , '###,###,##0')"/>
</td>

</xsl:for-each>

Thanks,
Dmitri

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com>
Sent: Jan 5, 2005 4:50 AM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [xsl] for-each and summing based on group

First read up about standard grouping techniques such as Muenchian grouping
at http://www.jenitennison.com/xslt/grouping

Computing a subtotal for each group is then a minor variant of the
technique: instead of merely iterating over the items in the group using
xsl:for-each, you can assign the node-set comprising the group to a
variable, and then sum over that using the sum() function.

Like all grouping problems, it's much easier in 2.0:

<xsl:for-each-group select="rows" group-by="columnA">
  <xsl:apply-templates select="current-group()"/>
  <subtotal><xsl:value-of select="sum(current-group()/columnB)"/></subtotal>
</xsl:for-each-group>

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/ 

-----Original Message-----
From: dsk [mailto:dmitrik(_at_)mindspring(_dot_)com] 
Sent: 05 January 2005 04:09
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: [xsl] for-each and summing based on group


within a for-each there might be various sets of values which 
produce the 
following grid, where val is equal to a number

a  val val val
a  val val val
a  val val val
b  val val val
b  val val val
c  val val val
c  val val val

what is the best way to insert a sum line for the first
column a, one for b, and one for c.

is a nested for each needed? or checking to see if the 
following value is 
not equal to the preceding, then then summing?

thanks,
Dmitri

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.802 / Virus Database: 545 - Release Date: 11/26/2004


--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: 
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--




--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--



--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--