Kenneth Stephen wrote:
It seems to me that you are talking about the pull vs push style
of XSLT programming and in your use case #3, it is the "pull" style.
Yes, that was the term I was searching for.
And, if I read you correctly, your uneasiness with this style is that
the tools are generating monlithic code. However, even in the pull
style, XSLT will allow a modular programming style by the use of
call-template . The fact that you dont get modular code is a problem
with the tools.
Yes, that's the problem with those tools. But since I'm thinking of
writing such a tool (which should make it better) I first have to
understand the problem with the existing ones! :)
Peter
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--