Michael, could you please explain your reasoning for adopting this
interpretation as against another possible interpretation, namely that
each stylesheet should be applied as a separate, chained,
transformation?
The xml-stylesheet spec says
Multiple xml-stylesheet processing instructions are also allowed with
exactly the same semantics as with LINK REL="stylesheet".
and in the case of link (especially but not exclusively with css)
multiple links are all applied to teh _same_ document (the xsl analogue
being to import them all in to one big virtual stylesheet) unless they
have alternate="yes" which doesn't mean that they alternate but rather
that they are alternatives: the system should apply one or the other but
not both.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--