On 4/28/05, Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Is the obvious (and only) solution to use xxx:node-set against
transformed / sorted XML?
The answer follows from the fact that XSLT is Turing-complete.
Therefore, any problem, which has solution using the xxx:node-set()
extension function should have a solution without using it.
In the case of grouping and then sorting, one such pure XSLT 1.0
solution can be found at:
http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200311/msg00659.html
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--