So, how else would you get the XSL
transformation to ignore something like this?
The other way is to not ignore it and instead create a transformation to
deal with it.
Is there a non-DOE way to do this?
The non-DOE way is how we solved it last week: grouping. That way, we meet
the requirement of well-formedness without resorting to DOE.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--