Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixin

Dimitre Novatchev wrote:

> What is really not elegant at all in XSLT 2.0 is the impossibility to
> define user data types inline in a stylesheet  -- forcing the
> programmer to artificially separate in different files type definition
> from type usage makes XSLT 2.0 rather unique... :(
>
> Of course, one would also like to see nested sequences, type classes
> and type equations...
Maybe XSLT 2.0 is just temporary language which will be shortly 
superseded by something called Haskslt or HasXSLT :-D
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek     e-mail: jirka(_at_)kosek(_dot_)cz     http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
     Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
       Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature