So, in XSLT 2.0 do you get a usable node-set or a result tree
fragment?
Neither. XPath2 loses both the node set datatype and the result tree
fragment datatype.
Both are replaced by sequnces (ie ordered finite lists) rather than the
unordered node set type of Xpath 1,also Xpath2 sequences can contain
values as well as nodes, so you can have a sequence (1,2,3) of three
integers for example (with exactly that syntax).
However the impotant thing here is that in 2.0 if you go
<xsl:varable name="x">
<xsl:apply-templates/>
</xsl:variable>
then $x holds a sequence of one document node which is something to
which you can apply a second set of templates. Thus the need to use a
node-set() funtion is removed.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--