Hi Bruce,
At 01:43 PM 5/24/2005, you wrote:
I'm not sure if I understand the logic you want here, however. Is the
second doe99 an ibid even though it's in a footnote?
Yes; at least in my system ;-)
Ah, good, okay. (To my mind whether it should be an ibid or not might
depend on whether footnotes are rendered at the foot of the page, or in
endnotes ... but I'll leave you to tangle with that. :-)
I just didn't want you to assume the same parent node. In a footnote
style, the p/citation gets translated into a footnote representation anyway.
Righto. The preceding:: axis looks at all preceding nodes, irrespective of
their parentage. (Ancestors don't appear on the preceding:: axis of course,
but that caveat does not apply here.)
Why is the third doe99 not an ibid, or if it is, is it by virtue of
"directly following" the first doe99 or the second?
Because ibid is only for single-reference citations. The third has
two. Idem. covers the case of multi-references that are the same.
I see.
So if test="count(../db:citation = 1) and @linkend =
preceding::db:citation[1]/@linkend", or something along those lines.
Cheers,
Wendell
======================================================================
Wendell Piez
mailto:wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--