I would like to group adjacent siblings which share the same
local-name
into a container element.
I thought that this would be the classical use-case for an
<xsl:for-each-group> with @group-adjacent, but I am getting the
strangest results...
I can't tell what you are doing wrong without seeing your code.
With ax as the context node, you can do
<xsl:for-each-group select="*" group-adjacent="local-name()">
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="current-grouping-key()='ex'">
<remark><xsl:copy-of select="current-group()"/></remark>
</
<xsl:otherwise>
<xsl:copy-of select="current-group()"/>
</
</
</
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--