Once some non-technical people I worked with referred to
them as 'xsl
scripts' which was awful and something I had to put right.
why?
Because I think it devalues XSLT to call it a script. Ok, it's
interpreted rather than compiled and it's relatively small but 'script'?
That's horrible. Just my opinion.
Do other programming languages have this problem. What do you
call a file full of C or java, or (coming closer to home) lisp?
No because their name carries no suggestion of their purpose. A java
file is a class, which is suitably obscure to mean anything and conveys
great wisdom. An xslt file is a stylesheet, a misnomer, which conveys a
lightweight scripting language at the presentation end of the process.
'stylesheet module', 'transform', neither really hit the mark for me,
but I can't think of anything better :(
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--