Bob's article has miscopied the relevant text from the spec. If you follow
the link to the text it is quoting, you will read:
[Definition: A sequence is an ordered collection of zero or more items.]
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Mukul Gandhi [mailto:mukul_gandhi(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)com]
Sent: 04 July 2005 09:55
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: [xsl] Unordered sequences in XPath 2.0
I am reading this article -
http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2005/02/02/xpath2.html
It says..
"A sequence is an unordered collection of zero or more
items."
(Please note the word unordered).
Then it says, "An XPath expression describes a set of
nodes, the value of that XPath expression is a
sequence".
This means, that the sequence representation of XPath
2.0 expression will be unordered.. Is this true? I
think, this was not the case with XPath 1.0?
Regards,
Mukul
____________________________________________________
Yahoo! Sports
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--