I am reading this article -
http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2005/02/02/xpath2.html
It says..
"A sequence is an unordered collection of zero or more
items."
(Please note the word unordered).
That's a typo. He meant ordered.
This means, that the sequence representation of XPath
2.0 expression will be unordered.. Is this true? I
think, this was not the case with XPath 1.0?
XPath 1.0 does not have sequences at all. It has node sets which are of
course unordered.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--