there are more XSLT 1.0 processors than the market needs,
Competition, especially in open-source, does tend to cause that to
happen, no? :)
But if you want me to stick my neck out, I would guess that there
might be 5 XSLT 2.0 processors by early 2006 and perhaps 8 a year later.
How complete they will be, and how many will be schema-aware, is
anyone's guess.
Looks like I won't get to see it incorporated into a Windows-based
editor (I can afford) for a while... :(
-Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 10:23 AM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [xsl] Transform XML to XML
Awesome! So when do you think most tools will support 2.0?
2007? 2008?
I expect to see a considerable shake-out: there are more XSLT 1.0
processors than the market needs, and many of them won't be upgraded.
But if you want me to stick my neck out, I would guess that there might
be 5 XSLT 2.0 processors by early 2006 and perhaps 8 a year later. How
complete they will be, and how many will be schema-aware, is anyone's
guess.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--