That's my problem too, and i don't think we'll see 2.0 support on
browsers anywhere soon...
On 8/24/05, Manfred Staudinger <manfred(_dot_)staudinger(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
I would like to use XSLT 2.0 only. But as the client side
processing depends on browser support, I have to split
my application and keep the stylesheets for the browser
at XSLT 1.0.
Or is support for XSLT 2.0 coming soon in any browser?
Regards, Manfred
On 8/24/05, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
So I think the best thing we XSLTers can do for now is try 2.0 and assess
it on our own, not paying too too much attention to the marketers either
way.
Cheers,
Wendell
Tried.
Assessed.
Remarkable results produced...
Just try to compare FXSL for XSLT 2.0 with FXSL for XSLT 1.0.
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--