xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 1.0 and 2.0 and suitability for tasks

2005-08-24 14:35:00
At 04:43 PM 8/24/2005, Dimitre wrote:
> So I think the best thing we XSLTers can do for now is try 2.0 and assess
> it on our own, not paying too too much attention to the marketers either way.

...

Tried.

Assessed.

Remarkable results produced...

Just try to compare FXSL for XSLT 2.0  with FXSL for XSLT 1.0.

Yes: for FXSL it is an obvious gain. So that's one scenario for which we have some kind of authoritative finding. :->

Cheers,
Wendell


======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            
mailto:wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================


--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--