Can someone confirm the problem I described
http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200511/msg00059.html
to be reproducible? Or is it just me?
It is reproducible, although oddly the version of your stylesheet as
appears in the archives is not well formed:
* every declaration of the xhtml namespace is followed by a spurious ";"
(incidentally you don't need most of those declarations)
* the text
This is my input file (abbreviated):
appears _before_ /xsl:stylesheet not after it.
Neither of these problems appears to be in your original mail, so the
list archives mail-to-html filter seems to have been confused.
You say
But what can be limited to less than 5k ?
It's a processor bug (if it hits some memory limit it ought to fail
rather than just give the wrong answer) so you'd need to report it to
their bugzilla system. I doubt it has anything to do with file _size_
but rather with recursion depth. Your template is a non-tail recursive
template and presumably you hit some stack overflow around 60 level of
recursion (which seems rather low, but in practice most systems will
have _some_ finite limit on recursion stack).
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--