My suspicion would be that Filemaker isn't asking Xalan to do the
serialization, but is doing it itself, perhaps using the serializer of a DOM
product, and is thus ignoring xsl:output entirely. This is wild speculation
of course. You could test this hypothesis by experimenting with parameters
such as indent="yes" to see if they affect the output.
But it looks as if this has become a support question to be addressed to
Filemaker.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: drkm [mailto:darkman_spam(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)fr]
Sent: 12 December 2005 10:22
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty?
Eric Scheid wrote:
doing a search at filemaker.com turned up references to
"XALAN-based" and "XERCES-based".
Strange. Xalan 2.7.0:
~/drafts/xslt $ cat empty.xsl
<xsl:transform xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
version="1.0">
<xsl:output method="html"/>
<xsl:template match="/"><html><br/></html></xsl:template>
</xsl:transform>
~/drafts/xslt $ xalan -XSL empty.xsl -IN empty.xsl
<html>
<br>
</html>
~/drafts/xslt $
Don't this tool permit you to change the XSLT processor to be
used? So you could use a correct implementation.
sadly no.
Not so funny :-(
--drkm
______________________________________________________________
_____________
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau
Yahoo! Messenger
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--