Catching up again --
At 08:30 PM 2/7/2006, David wrote:
> Thanks for the response. Your solution does in fact work perfectly.
> The only problem is when I move the refnote element around (I used
> 1,2,3 for testing purposes however in truth these are more on the
> lines of 2341234, 245532139, etc.) I don't get the results I expect.
just use the attribute on xsl:number to control whether it just numbers
in the current element, or the whole document, or from teh nearest
appendix ancestor or whatever you need.
I'm not sure quite what you want as I think you have a typo in your
revised version
No, it's a bit obscure ... both the references he's pointing to (1
and 3) are within the same appendix.
So he needs xsl:number from="appendix" just as you surmised.
Spenser, this is a far cleaner better solution than what you've
posted here so far.
Cheers,
Wendell
======================================================================
Wendell Piez
mailto:wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--