Yeah, but my point is that if xquery 1 is based on xpath 2 then xpath
2 was considered worth doing. I suppose then that xpath 2 would be
available as its own class, if so it would be easier to build open
source xslt 2 projects.
cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen
On 2/9/06, David Carlisle <davidc(_at_)nag(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:
If you have Xquery 1.0 doesn't that mean XPath 2 was worth doing?
http://blogs.msdn.com/xmlteam/archive/2005/06/07/426511.aspx
http://donxml.com/allthingstechie/archive/2005/12/12/2338.aspx
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--