On Thu, March 9, 2006 5:10 pm, Wendell Piez wrote:
Walter,
At 03:36 PM 3/9/2006, you wrote:
After a lot of thought and mulling about, I thought I'd share what I
was thinking in regards to the "pure" XML I refered to earlier...
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<article id="43467">
<status>in process</status>
...
[etc.]
or I was thinking about this for the </content> space...
<content>
<title>Intro paragraph here.</title>
<sub-title>Main paragraph.</sub-title>
<body>
<![CDATA[all my xHTML goes in here]]>
</body>
</content>
Hint: if that CDATA marked section is an indicator that you plan to
place "escaped" HTML -- don't do it. You'll regret it.
I only brought it up because this is what we do now to send our content to
a client.
I have no idea why it's done this way, and I'm told I can't ask their IT
anything on this either. :/
If you want to use HTML, go ahead and use it.
That's jus tit, I don't know if it should stay in HTML, or go "pure" XML
(as my prevos post gave an example of my concept)
As for the modeling -- before you embark on this, I suggest you look
into some of the industry-standard DTDs and schemas out there.
Thanks for the pointers.
I'll be looking at those in the morning
Or am I way over thinking this?
Not necessarily. But it *is* off topic now....
OK, since this is "OT" where do I go so that this dicsussion in on-topic?
Thanks
Walter
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--