xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [xsl] Is this strategy for runtime fixed-width->xml conversions worthwhile?

2006-04-29 15:08:27
If I'm restricted to XSLT 1.0, how viable is my approach?  
I'm guessing if my input is truly "fixed", with no repeating 
groups or conditional transformation blocks, this should work 
fine.  If I have either repeating groups or conditional 
transformation blocks, that makes it a little more 
complicated, but I'm not sure how much more.

I don't think I would have wanted to tackle the example in this article
using XSLT 1.0: I would have done it in Java. You can certainly do simple
string-handling in 1.0, however.

This article was written around the Saxon 8.1 timeframe.  
Would this article change significantly if it was updated to 
reflect more recent Saxon releases?

No. The spec was already pretty stable by then. Most of the changes since
then have been refining the definition of edge cases.

Concerning features of Saxon, I'm not certain exactly what 
"schema-aware" means.  

See http://www.stylusstudio.com/schema_aware.html for an explanation.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/





--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>